That day in order to prepare ourself for the interview with Mr. Eiriksson, we’ve scoped the city of Reykjavik with an eye on how the buildings are constructed. To be precise we looked at glazings, insulations, wall coverings and roofs and compared them to our (swiss) standart.
What we’ve seen shocked us quite a bit. But it expresses also the abundance of energy and how the people are dealing with that.
During our walk around we haven’t seen double glazing, or tripple glazing, almost no building was insulated and the allover state of them was quite bad. (maybe because of the financial crisis Iceland went through). With climatic conditions, a bit more extreme than Switzerland, they didn’t care about making their buildings fully suitable for their evironment. Why this is like it is, we’ve learned later that day in the interview.
This expresses the abundance quite well. it isn’t necessary to make the buildings sustainable. There are a few reasons why most of the Icelandic people aren’t conscient about the necessity of sustainable living, one is their isolated position on the globe another reason ist he expensive import of constroction materials an d the cheap energy prices. All this is connected with with an underlaying nationalism (the idea and the fact that there are just 310000 icelanders standing alone).
Beside our walk-around we’ve also enjoyed the cities amenities, the perfect espresso-machiatos at KAFFITARIN and a nice lunch at SOLAN. These two places are a perfect example of Icelands skill of adapting and translating foreign ideas and concepts. This is in fact one of Icelands most known Skills. With that as a background we can’t still understand why in energy.sustainability reasons Iceland is so conservative or let’s say blind.
Highlight of the day was the interview with Mr. Eiriksson from Reykjavik based architects T.atrk (www.tark.is). Mr. Eiriksson Studied in the United States at the university of Uirginia, ths is allso where he first came in touch with the concept of sustainabitity.
The interview covred every aspect of our main question (To read at the top of our blog).
Just at the very beginning Mr. Eiriksson spoke about Sustainability in Iceland and the climate as a part of it. We were told, that there isn‘t any sustainable design in architecture in Iceland. Due to this fact, architects are a minority, engineers build the houses. There is an abundance of green energy and water, but they don‘t have sources for concrete, glass, metal, wood or insulation. To show an example he spoke about a low energy house with triple glazing. For such a building they need to import the glass. The grey energy which is produced due to this extra amount of glass and the transport to iceland would be a bigger issue than not insulating the windows. That‘s the point, where it should be started. The question is about to find the optimum for houses in connection with insulation. It‘s about a moral question, to start saving energy and to get out of that guilt.
In Iceland there are only two points, where fresh, cool water isn‘t available as an unlimited source out of the ground. (In fact in Iceland water is an abundant resource, but most of it is hot water, so the problem about the water issue ist hat there is a very limited amount of cold water). One is around the airport of Kefflavik If they take too much water out of this reservoir, new water can‘t be replaced fast enough due to the characteristics of the stone.
As a starting point he sees an allready develloped hard- and software to make better economical shapes during a building process. So the software learns from experience. In the shipbuilding industry there is already such a drift to optimize ships from the start.
This leads to „thinking buildings“ used as a model to devellop architecture. It‘s also a good argument against why Iceland isn‘t producing green energy for the whole world. The main point of that way of thinking architecture is to be able to create buildigs witch fit perfectly into the local conditions. With parameters like the material prices, shippment taxes, availability, cost of the building process, availability of skilled professionals, local geological conditions, weather conditions, ammount of grey energy, etc. it is possible to balance out everv detail of a building. As mentioned for example to ship all the insulation materials witch is needed to get the icelandic buildings „sustainable“ (from our point of view), is nearly impossible because it is very expensive. (And because of the fact, that energy in Iceland is cheap, almost no one thinks about getting their houses sustainable.)
So as we know now, there is an ongoing effort to create a sustainable solution for Icelandic houses, although Mr. Eiriksson is one out of a very small think-tank we hope that they at least are able to get the Icelanders think about their situation, and that oit may be better to be a sustainable soceity even if energy is abundant.
As it has been told before, Mr. Eiriksson and his Think-tank are tinking about self-sustaining houses (very much like the abundance initiative). When for example solar panels are getting better, a single house produces more energy than it‘s using, so they can sell it to others. Big energy companies now control the grid between the houses, and the whole energy distribution system. If the number of self-sufficient houses now increases,, the energy production will be democratic ,and no longer monopolised. Wha then is needed is a system to distribute the energy globally from where it’s produced to where it is needed.
To concluse it is needed to optimize every building for its emissions in grey energy and to think about what are the most effective parameters to save energy. After that solar panels and other techniques like hot water pipes on the roof should be installed for a self-sustaining culture. At start it wouldn‘t be very effective, but in developing and optimizing all parts, there would be an abundance of energy allover the world. The main point is about to share the spare energy. Some countries should start earlier, others like Iceland join later, if it would be necessary to use other sources of gaining green energy.

